[1]Mark JW,Koelemay PJ,Nederkoorn JB, et al. Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease[J]. Stroke, 2004, 35(10):2306-2312. [2]Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Hunink MG, et al. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis:a systematic review[J].Stroke, 2003, 34(5):1324-1331. [3]Lell M, Anders K, Klotz E, et al. Clinical evaluation of bone-subtraction CT angiography (BSCTA) in head and neck imaging[J]. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16(4):889-897. [4]Tomandl BF, Hammen T, Klotz E, et al. Bone-subtraction CT angiography for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2006, 27(1):55-59. [5]Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, et al. Material differentiation by dual-energy CT: initial experience[J]. Eur Radiol, 2007, 17(6):1510-1517. [6]Vanninen RL, Manninen HI, Koivisto K, et al. Carotid stenosis by digital subtraction angiography reproducibility of the European Carotid Surgery Trial and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial measurement Methods and visual interpretation[J]. AJNR Am J Roentgenol,1994, 15(9):1635-1641. [7]Staikov IN, Arnold M, Mattle HP, et al. Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading Methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trial.North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial[J].J Neurol,2000, 247(9):681-686. [8]RemondaL, Sennb P, Barthb A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2002, 23(2):213-219. [9]Furst G, Hofer M, Sitzer M, et al. Factors influencing flow induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study[J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,1995, 19(5):692-699. [10]Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Nakagawa T, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1997, 18(1):135-143. [11]Meyer BC, Werncke T, Hopfenmüller W, et al. Dual energy CT of peripheral arteries: effect of automatic bone and plaque removal on image quality and grading of stenoses[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2008, 68(3):414-422. [12]Watanabe Y, Uotani K, Nakazawa T, et al. Dual-energy direct bone removal CT angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysm or stenosis:comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography[J]. Eur Radiol, 2009, 19(4):1019-1024. [13]朱宗明,张宗军,季学满,等.颈动脉粥样硬化老年患者的双源CT血管造影分析[J]. 医学研究生学报,2008,21(8):839-844. [14]Chiro GD, Brooks RA, Kessler RM, et al. Tissue signatures with dual energy computed tomography[J]. Radiology, 1979, 131(2):521-523. [15]Serfaty JM, Chirossel P, Chevallier JM, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2000,175(2):455-463. [16]Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, Mali WP, et al. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 36(4):806-813.
|