[1]DOrsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS-US(ed 1)[M]. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003:77-79.
[2]Fattaneh A, Tavassoli, Devilee P. World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathologic and genetics tumours of breast and female genital organs [M].Lyon: IARC Press, 2003:10-11.
[2]Raza S, Chikarmane SA, Neilsen SS, et al. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management-follow-up and outcome [J]. Radiology, 2008, 248(3):773-781.
[2]Zonderland HM, Pope TL Jr, Nieborg AJ. The positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system(BI-RADS)as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population [J]. Eur Radiol, 2004, 14(10):1743-1750.
[2]Heinig J, Witteler R, Schmitz R, et al. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 32(4):573-578.
[2]Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, et al. Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy(SVABB)[J]. Ann Oncol, 2004, 15(3):450-454.
[2]Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, et al. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy [J]. Radiology, 1999, 211(3):845-850.
[2]Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, et al. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features[J]. AJR, 2005, 184(4):1260-1265.
[2]Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization[J]. Radiology, 2006, 241(2):355-365.
[2]El-Sayed ME, Rakha EA, Reed J, et al. Predictive value of needle core biopsy diagnoses of lesions of uncertain malignant potential(B3)in abnormalities detected by mammographic screening[J]. Histopathology, 2008, 53(6):650-657.
[11]Cohen MA, Sferlazza SJ. Role of sonography in evaluation of radial scars of the breast [J]. AJR, 2000, 174(4):1075-1078.
|